LIBERTAS PRAESTANTISSIMUM PDF
Encyclical: Libertas Praestantissimum-On Human Liberty [Pope Leo XIII] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Liberty—one of the world’s most. Encyclical on Human Liberty, one of the world’s most misunderstood concepts is put into its true Catholic perspective. Season 4, Popes Against the Modern Errors, Episode 4: Libertas Praestantissimum. by Member Supported Restoration Radio · May 20,
|Published (Last):||19 March 2005|
|PDF File Size:||18.73 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.20 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Again, it is not of itself wrong to prefer a democratic form of government, if only the Catholic doctrine be maintained as to the origin and exercise of power. But such laws by no means derive their origin from civil society, because, just as civil society did not create human nature, so neither can it be said to be the author of the good which befits human nature, or of the evil which is contrary to it. For, what reason and the natural law do for individuals, that human lawpromulgated for their good, does for the citizens of States.
Libertas (June 20, ) | LEO XIII
But the manner in which such dignity is exercised is of the greatest moment, inasmuch as on the use that is made of liberty the highest good and the greatest evil alike depend. Considered as to its nature, it is the faculty of choosing means fitted for the end proposed, for he is master of his actions who can choose one thing out of many.
These precepts of the truest and highest teaching, made known to us by the light of reason itself, the Church, instructed by the example and doctrine of her divine Author, has ever propagated and asserted; for she has ever made them the measure of her office and of her teaching to the Christian nations.
And, what is still more important, and what We have more than once pointed out, although the civil authority has not the same proximate end as the spiritual, nor proceeds on the same lines, nevertheless in the exercise of their separate powers they must occasionally meet.
Now, truth, which should be the only subject matter of those who teach, is of two kinds: In the government of States it is not forbidden to imitate the Ruler of the world; and, as the authority of man is powerless to prevent every evil, it has as St. Unless it be otherwise determined, by reason of some exceptional condition of things, it is expedient to take part in the administration of public affairs.
Lastly, we must not forget that a vast field lies freely open to man’s industry and genius, containing all those things which have no necessary connection with Christian faith and morals, or as to which the Church, exercising no authority, leaves the judgment of the learned free and unconstrained.
Thus, the powerful influence of the Church has ever been manifested in the custody and protection of the civil and political liberty of the people. For, since the force of law consists in the imposing of obligations and the granting of rights, authority is the one and only foundation of all law – the power, that is, of fixing duties and defining rights, as also of assigning the necessary sanctions of reward and chastisement to each and all of its commands.
Season 4, Popes Against the Modern Errors, Episode 4: Libertas Praestantissimum
And now to reduce for clearness’ sake to its principal heads all that has been set forth with its immediate conclusions, the summing up in this briefly: Thus, too, license will gain what liberty loses; for liberty will ever be more free and secure in proportion as license is kept in fuller restraint.
Thus, truth being gradually obscured by darkness, pernicious and manifold error, as too often happens, will easily prevail. Thomas says “performs those actions which are directly and immediately ordained for the divine honor”, 7 rules and tempers all virtues. In this, human law must endeavor to imitate God, who, as St. Others oppose not the existence of the Church, nor indeed could they; yet they despoil her of the nature and rights of a perfect society, and maintain that it does not belong to her to legislate, to judge, or to punish, but only to exhort, to advise, and to rule her subjects in accordance with their own consent and will.
We now only wish to add the remark that liberty of so false a nature is greatly hurtful to the true liberty of both rulers and their subjects. History bears witness to the energy with which she met the fury of the Manichaeans and others like them; and the earnestness with which in later years she defended human liberty at the Council of Trent, and against the followers of Jansenius, is known to all.
Therefore, the divine teaching of the Church, so far liibertas being an obstacle to the pursuit of learning and the progress of science, or in any way retarding the advance of civilization, in reality brings to them the sure guidance of shining light. Nature herself proclaims the necessity of the State providing means and opportunities whereby the community may be enabled to live properly, that is to say, according to the laws of God.
Libertas Praestantissimum Archives – Jon Haines
It is with moral liberty, whether in individuals or in communities, that We proceed at once to deal. Add to which, no true virtue can exist without religion, for moral virtue is concerned with those things which lead to God as man’s supreme and ultimate good; and therefore religion, which as St.
There are others, somewhat more moderate though not more consistent, who affirm that the morality of individuals is to be guided by the divine law, but not the morality of the State, for that in public affairs the commands of God may be passed over, and may be entirely disregarded in the framing of laws. Whenever there exists, or there is reason to fear, an unjust oppression of the people on the one hand, or a deprivation of the liberty of the Church on the other, it is lawful to seek for such a change of government as will bring about due liberty of action.
In this they are plainly inconsistent. Thus it is that the infinitely perfect God, although supremely free, because of the supremacy of His intellect and of His essential goodness, nevertheless cannot choose evil; neither can the angels and saints, who enjoy the beatific vision.
Augustine and others urged most admirably against the Pelagians that, if the possibility of deflection from good belonged to the essence or perfection of liberty, then God, Jesus Christ, and the angels and saints, who have not this pdaestantissimum, would have no liberty at all, or would have less liberty than man has in his state of pilgrimage and imperfection.
No sensible man can doubt that judgment is an act of reason, not of the will. Indeed, if what they say were really true, there would be no tyranny, no matter how monstrous, which we should not be bound to endure and submit to.
It is for those, then, who are capable of forming a just estimate of things to decide whether such doctrines promote that true liberty which alone is worthy of man, or rather, pervert and destroy it. The precepts, therefore, of the natural law, contained bodily in the laws of men, have not merely the force of human law, but they possess that higher and more august sanction which belongs to the law of nature and the eternal liberrtas.
The fundamental doctrine of rationalism is the supremacy of the human reason, which, refusing due submission llbertas the divine and eternal reason, proclaims its own independence, and constitutes itself the supreme principle and source and judge of truth.
By many and convincing libergas, often used by defenders of Christianity, certain leading truths have been laid prestantissimum Since, then, the profession of one religion is necessary in the State, that religion must be professed which alone is true, and which can be recognized without difficulty, especially in Catholic States, because the marks of truth are, as it were, engravers upon it.
For, law is the guide of man’s actions; it turns him toward good by its rewards, and deters him from evil by its punishments.
Liberttas hope has been disappointed by the result. And his judgment not only decides what is right or wrong of its own nature, but ppraestantissimum what is practically good and therefore to be chosen, and what is practically evil and therefore to be avoided.
Thus, an prestantissimum barrier being opposed to tyranny, the authority in the State will not have all its own way, but the interests and rights of all will be safeguarded – the rights of individuals, of domestic society, and of all the members of the commonwealth; all being praestwntissimum to live according to law and right reason; and in this, as We have shown, true liberty really consists.
Now, there are other enactments of the civil authority, which do not follow directly, but somewhat remotely, from the natural law, and decide many points which the law of nature treats only in a general and indefinite way. Thus, it is manifest that man’s best and surest teacher is God, the Source and Principle of all truth; and peaestantissimum only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, the Way, the Truth, and the Life, the true Light which enlightens every man, and to whose teaching all must submit: Of natural truths, such as the principles of nature and whatever is derived from them immediately by our reason, there is a kind of common patrimony in the human race.
In such case, an excessive and vicious liberty is not sought, but only some relief, for the praestqntissimum welfare, in order that, while license for evil is allowed by the State, the power of doing good may not be hindered.
But where the power to command is libbertas, or where a law is enacted contrary to reason, or to the eternal law, or to some ordinance of God, obedience is unlawful, lest, while obeying man, we become disobedient to God. If unbridled license of speech and of writing be granted to all, nothing will remain sacred and inviolate; even the highest and truest mandates of natures, justly held to be the common and noblest heritage prqestantissimum the human race, will not be spared.
These truths she has always taught, and has sustained them as a dogma of faith, and whensoever heretics or innovators have attacked the liberty of man, the Church has defended it and protected this noble possession from destruction.
This religion, therefore, the rulers of the State must preserve and protect, if they would provide – as they should do – lbiertas prudence and usefulness for the good of the community. In like manner, this great gift of nature has ever been, and always will be, deservingly cherished by the Catholic Church, for to her alone has been committed the charge of handing down to all ages the benefits purchased for us by Jesus Christ.
For if – as they must admit, and no one can rightly deny – the will of praestantissimun Divine Law-giver is to be obeyed, because every man is under the power of God, and tends toward Him as his end, it follows that no one can assign limits to His legislative authority without failing in the obedience which is due.
We need not mention how greatly religion conduces to pure morals, and pure morals to liberty.